Hepatitis C Treatment Slashes Risk of Cancer and Improves Life Expectancy, Study Finds

Large survey reveals that few MS patients have long-term care insurance
March 8, 2019
Doctors Often Miss Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults, New Study Suggests
March 8, 2019
Show all

Hepatitis C Treatment Slashes Risk of Cancer and Improves Life Expectancy, Study Finds

Life expectancy improves after hepatitis C treatment.

A major French study involving nearly 10,000 patients with hepatitis C found that treatment with the new generation of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs decreases a patient’s risk of liver cancer and increases life expectancy.

This fundamental study helps answer questions about the long-term benefit of DAAs such as sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) and daclatasvir (Daklinza), which boast 90% cure rates but have been criticized for sky-high price tags. The study, which was led by Fabrice Carrat, Ph.D., with the Sorbonne University in Paris, was published in The Lancet Feb. 11.

Though prior observational studies have indicated that patients treated with DAAs are less likely to develop hepatocellular carcinoma, the French study is the first large prospective study to compare outcomes among treated and untreated patients.

The study, which followed 7,344 treated and 2,551 untreated patients for nearly three years, found that DAA exposure was associated with a 34% drop in hepatocellular carcinoma and a 52% drop in all-cause mortality.

This study further supports the use of DAAs in all patients with chronic hepatitis C, rather than older reimbursement policies that prioritized treatment for the sickest patients. The research was funded by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research and the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (Inserm-ANRS).

The study also received funding from the pharmaceutical companies Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen, Gilead, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche — all of which have DAAs on the market.

Interpretation of Results

From 2012 to 2016, French researchers screened 10,166 patients with hepatitis C, ultimately following 9,895 for a median time period of 33.4 months. About three-fourths of the patients were treated with DAAs, while the remainder still hadn’t started treatment by the time the study ended.

These distinct cohorts allowed researchers to compare outcomes for treated and untreated groups. Out of the 7,344 patients who were treated with DAAs, 129 had died by the end of the study — a death rate of less than 2%. Conversely, out of the 2,551 untreated patients, 89 died — a death rate of about 4%.

Meanwhile, 187 treated patients and 71 untreated patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma — both at about a rate of 3%. However, the benefit of DAA treatment became truly apparent after researchers adjusted for dramatic differences in the overall health profiles of patients in the treated and untreated cohorts.

Study co-author Stanislas Pol, M.D., Ph.D., with Paris Descartes University, observed that hepatitis C treatment and reimbursement policies have only recently started to emphasize universal treatment. During the study, treatment in France was restricted to “priority” patients with extensive health problems such as severe fibrosis or cirrhosis.

“These patients have of course the highest risk of [hepatocellular carcinoma], and that is why we need to reduce the heterogeneities of both population[s],” Pol said. Researchers accounted for variables such as age, body mass index, infection route, fibrosis score, alcohol consumption, and other health conditions associated with worse hepatitis C outcomes.

To evaluate the data, researchers used a method called the “inverse probability of treatment weighting” and other statistical methods. Weighing the data in this manner allowed the researchers to produce a true comparison, akin to what you would see in a randomized trial, Pol explained.

Read on: Hepatitis C Treatment Slashes Risk of Cancer and Improves Life Expectancy, Study Finds

The health and medical information on our website is not intended to take the place of advice or treatment from health care professionals. It is also not intended to substitute for the users’ relationships with their own health care/pharmaceutical providers.

Comments are closed.