Hepatitis C and you: A guide to deciding whether to get tested, and how to connect to treatment resources in your area 
February 8, 2018
Drinking alcohol raises risk of cancer by snapping DNA, scientists find
February 8, 2018
Show all

Rituxan Outperforms A Half-Dozen Multiple Sclerosis Therapies In Study

Which is the best medication to try first, when newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis?

In a study of how people newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis fared on the first therapy they tried, a drug that isn’t even approved for the disease came out on top. Rituximab, sold by Roche as Rituxan to treat non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and rheumatoid arthritis, outperformed newer MS drugs from Biogen and Novartis.

The study used medical records, and falls short of the certainty given through randomized controlled clinical trials, the gold standard of medical evidence. But it is likely to raise new questions about why Roche did not develop Rituxan for MS, choosing instead to focus on a newer drug, Ocrevus. It also means it’s possible that newer drugs, like Biogen’s Tecfidera and Novartis’ Gilenya, could face competition from off-label Rituxan, depending on whether insurers decide to cover it.

“Our early studies in MS Phase II rituximab trials provided proof of concept for the central role of CD20-positive B-cell targeted medicines in MS,” Roche said in a statement. “At that time, we had a number of anti-CD20 targeted molecules in our portfolio with a range of different features. We advanced Ocrevus, a humanised anti-CD20 antibody, into late stage development because we believed it had the best potential efficacy and safety profile for patients with MS, a disease where long-term treatment is warranted.”

Drugs to treat MS have proliferated as more effective treatments have been approved, with some half dozen options now available. But it’s still difficult for patients and doctors to choose the right first treatment in the crucial early days after diagnosis, when the autoimmune disease that attacks the nervous system hasn’t yet caused irreparable damage.

Researchers in Sweden looked back on the records of nearly 500 MS patients receiving treatment in two different counties to see whether patients kept taking the first drug they tried, and if their disease progressed while they were on it. “Collectively, if you look at efficacy, safety, and tolerability, patients did best when they started on rituximab,” says lead study author and neurologist Fredrik Piehl of the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden. The results were published in JAMA Neurology Monday.

Patients that started on rituximab stopped taking the drug at a rate of 0.03 per year. Those on first-generation therapies including the interferon-betas (Biogen’s Avonex and EMD Serono’s Rebif) and glatiramer acetate (Teva’s Copaxone) stopped at a rate of 0.53 per year; dimethyl fumarate (Biogen’s Tecfidera) 0.32 per year, fingolimod (Novartis’ Gilenya) 0.38 per year, and natalizumab (Biogen’s Tysabri) 0.29 per year. Patients on rituximab also had fewer relapses and new brain lesions seen on MRI, though the difference didn’t reach statistical significance for fingolimod and natalizumab.

In a statement, Teva pointed out “there are many caveats when attempting to draw conclusions across multiple data sources without replication through well-controlled head-to-head trials for confirmation.”

“The comparison of drugs which are commonly administered to patients who are early in the disease-course and whose disease was relatively inactive at that time to drugs which are used to treat patients with very active disease and approved as 2nd line are subject to bias,” Novartis said in a statement. “Adding to this, a drug which has not been approved by regulatory authorities for the treatment of MS in a dose which has not been clearly defined is doubtful regarding any derived conclusions.” The sample size of patients taking Gilenya in the study was too small to provide “any meaningful statistical significance,” Novartis said, and its data show approximately 90% adherence to the therapy.

“Head-to-head, blinded, controlled, randomized studies are the best way to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of therapies,” Biogen said in a statement. “In the absence of such studies, comparative-effectiveness analyses are a valid approach, provided they are adjusted to account for the baseline characteristics of the populations under study.”

Read full article: Rituxan Outperforms A Half-Dozen Multiple Sclerosis Therapies In Study

Read Full Article: Rituxan Outperforms A Half-Dozen Multiple Sclerosis Therapies In Study

The health and medical information on our website is not intended to take the place of advice or treatment from health care professionals. It is also not intended to substitute for the users’ relationships with their own health care/pharmaceutical providers.

Comments are closed.